Driver Severs Thief’s Arm With SUV (VIDEO)

Driver Severs Thief’s Arm With SUV (VIDEO)


A SEVENTEEN-YEAR-OLD WAS
TRYING TO STEAL SNEAKERS FROM A PERSON THAT HE MADE A
DEAL WITH ONLINE, BUT IT DID NOT WORK OUT THE WAY
HE EXPECTED IT TO. WE HAVE A VIDEO SHOWING WHAT
HAPPENED, IT IS A LITTLE GRAPHICS SO I WANT TO
GIVE YOU FAIR WARNING. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A
NORMAL CRAIGSLIST BUY AND SELL, DID NOT END THAT WAY. THE DRIVER INSIDE OF THAT SUV, A
GUY NAMED PHIL, WHO SAID HE SELLS TENNIS SHOES OFF OF
CRAIGSLIST JUST AS A HOBBY AND TO PROVIDE FOR HIS FAMILY,
HE WAS JUST GOING TO DO THAT AGAIN THIS FRIDAY, BUT IT
DID NOT END THAT WAY. THE TEENAGER YOU SEE WALKING UP,
HE THOUGHT WAS GOING TO A SIMPLE PURCHASE OF
THE TENNIS SHOES. THE TEAM GOT IN THE SUV, BUT
INSIDE, INVESTIGATORS SAY THAT THE TEENAGER
PULLED A GUN ON THE THIRTY-FIVE-YEAR-OLD,
BUT THE GUN JAMMED. THE TEENAGER THEN GRABBED
THE SHOES AND RAN OFF. YOU THOUGHT THAT WAS THE END OF
THIS STORY, BUT THAT IS WHERE IT BECOMES A LITTLE
MORE CONGREGATED. HE TRIED TO GET A BUS, COULD NOT
GET THE BUS, AND THE DRIVER TURNED AROUND AND AS YOU CAN SEE
IN THE TOP OF THE SCREEN, RAN OVER THE TEENAGER. WOW. I CAN’T EVEN MAKE A JOKE. TELLS WHAT HAPPENED. HE MIRACULOUSLY SURVIVED,
BUT GETTING HIT BY THE CAR SEVERED HIS ARM BELOW THE ELBOW. AUTHORITIES WERE ABLE TO FIND
HIM COLLAPSED IN THE YARD OF HIS MOTHER’S HOME. HE IS FACING CHARGES, INCLUDING
HAVING AN UNLAWFUL WEAPON AND PULLING A GUN ON THE SKY. THE MAN WHO RAN OVER HIM IS
ALSO FACING ATTEMPTED MURDER CHARGES, AND THAT IS WHERE THE
STORY GETS CONJUGATED. SHOULD DEMAND FACE ATTENDED
MURDER CHARGES FOR WHAT HE DID? THE LAWYER FOR THE MAN WHO RAN
HIM OVER SAYS, “I DON’T MEAN TO BE HARSH, BUT I THINK MISTER SAM
IN A SENSE WAS GETTING WHAT HE DESERVES. MY CLIENT IS AN ABSOLUTE
VICTIM IN THIS CASE.” YEAH, NO. IT IS PROPAGATED. IF I’M THE MAN IN THE GARDEN WAS
GOING TO GET ROB, I AM SUPER PISSED. PUT A GUN TO MY FACE, HE COULD
HAVE DIED, HE HAD THREE KIDS, SO IT’S NOT LIKE WE HAVE SYMPATHY
FOR THE SEVENTEEN-YEAR-OLD. TERRIBLE THING TO DO, BUT THAT
GUYS LIKE IN DANGER, SO I GET WHY HE WAS STEAMING MAD,
BUT YOU CANNOT RUN SOMEBODY OVER FOR ROBBING YOU. IT IS DISPROPORTIONATE. ATTEMPTED MURDER IS A HEAVY
CHARGE, BUT YOU RAN HIM OVER SO BADLY THAT IT SEVERED HIS ARM. THERE HAS TO BE SOME CHARGES, I
DON’T KNOW IF THERE’S GOING TO BE A JURY ñ
LET HIM GO ANYWAY. THAT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE. IF I WAS ON THE JURY, WE CANNOT
LET YOU RUN PEOPLE OVER FOR ROBBING YOU, NO MATTER HOW MAD WE WOULD BE UNDER THE SAME
CIRCUMSTANCES. THERE IS A PART OF ME YOU
WANT THAT PREVENTS, WHO WANTS TO BE ANGRY AND IRRATIONAL, AND
WANTS THAT STUPID SEVENTEEN-YEAR-OLD GET WHAT IS COMING TO THEM. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, YOU CANNOT
DO WHAT IS AGAINST THE LAW. THE ONLY TIME YOU CAN ATTACK
SOMEONE LIKE THAT, WITH ANY TYPE OF WEAPON THAT CAN KILL
SOMEONE, WHETHER IT IS A GUN OR A CAR, IS WHEN THAT INDIVIDUAL
POSES AN IMMINENT THREAT. THAT SEVENTEEN-YEAR-OLD AT THAT
MOMENT DID NOT POSE A THREAT BECAUSE HE HAD ALREADY WALKED AWAY. THERE IS WHAT THE LAW SAYS AND
WHAT WE WANT TO DO, AND WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE LAW. IF THE KID IS POINTING A GUN
AT HIM AND HE HITS THE GAS PEDALS THAT HE DOES NOT GET
SHOT, THAT IS SELF-DEFENSE, BUT THE CAR IS A DEADLY WEAPON HERE,
AND THE SEVENTEEN-YEAR-OLD IS CLEARLY WALKING AWAY. IT IS FRUSTRATING THAT IT IS
OVER, YOU’RE GOING TO CALL THE COPS AND THEY’RE NOT GOING
TO BE ABLE TO FIND HIM. I HAVE BEEN ROBBED BEFORE, THE
COPS DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TRYING TO FIND A GUY, AND I HAD
HIS FINGERPRINTS, HE LEFT A TIGHT HANDPRINT ON MY WINDOW. THEY WERE LIKE, YEAH WE ARE
WORKING ON IT AROUND THE CLOCK. SO I KNOW HOW DISMISSIVE THEY
CAN BE AND HOW FRUSTRATING IT IS. BUT IF I FOUND A GUY WHO BROUGHT
MY APARTMENT AND RAN HIM OVER WITH MY CAR, THAT IS NOT. IF THE GUY HAD DRIVEN AWAY,
AND NOT DONE ANYTHING, THIS SEVENTEEN-YEAR-OLD IS FREE TO
JUST GO OFF AND DO THIS AGAIN, SO WHAT HAVE WHAT POINT
DOES HE ACTUALLY SHOOT SOMEONE? IT IS A DIFFICULT STORY. SURGEONS WERE APPARENTLY
ABLE TO REATTACH THE ARM, WHICH WAS SEVERED
BELOW THE ELBOW. WHEN YOU HAVE TO PICK UP YOUR
ARM FROM THE SCENE AND RUN WITH IT, THAT IS WHAT YOU DON’T
RUN PEOPLE OVER, BECAUSE HE EASILY COULD HAVE KILLED
HIM, AND HE MAIMED HIM.

100 comments

  1. The boy got what he deserved. If the gun had not jammed. That Man with 3 children would be dead right now. So the man was just trying to make money probably to pay his bills and feed his three children. And where are the parents when did teenagers was trying to kill .run to the front yard of his mother's house wasn't that his house too. And where was his mother and father at when he was trying to kill a man. And he goes to the hospital and they sewed the arm back on . The man with the three kids was probably so upset and out of his head thinking about he could have just died, He did that in self-defense run over him. So the police would know who he was and he couldn't get away. Who knows if it's young teenager had did this before and let the person dead, who knows if he had killed someone before in a robbery. I just hope that all it comes out in the hearing and that young man gets what he deserves ,cuz he could have killed that man in that van.

  2. 4:50 what if the kid goes and kills someone if he tries it again

    na the kid got what came to him
    once a criminal always a criminal

  3. The teens a murderer. Can anyone explain the significant ethical difference between a murderer and an attempted murderer to me?

  4. It wasnt just robbery… the gun jammed he tried to murder him. The only reason that hes not dead is by chance the gun jammed. They completely leaved out that information

  5. You reach I teach….

    The kid reach for a gun the man told him this is the result that you get I'm going to take that arm he got what he deserved he tried to kill them in over a pair of shoes

  6. Hold up did she say the 17 year old kid didn't pose a threat did she realize the boys pulled a gun he attempted to fire but a jam and other words he was going to murder that guy that's attempted murder on a 17 year old kid who's going to blow this guy's brains out over some shoes lucky the gun Jam

  7. Might be a white guy who robbed the van driver. If he was black it would be more details about robber and his race. He's not an immigrant so Trump and his lackeys won't.🤔 comment.

  8. Yes, the driver was not in imminent danger when he ran the boy over, but he must’ve been in a red rage after the little scrote pointed a gun at him and actually pulled the trigger. I would’ve been.

  9. If you reported the whole story you would know the kid pulled the trigger but the gun jammed! He committed ATTEMPTED MURDER!!! I would have run him over too

  10. "pissed" and "stupid" aren't necessarily the right words to describe the victim and robber. No. If someone shoots you in the face but the gun jammed, are you "pissed"???

    A-holes sitting in air-conditioned studios wearing $3000 suits are not actually in the street dealing with the danger.

    Complete BS.

  11. so if that kid would have killed that man in front of his family…. would that be ok then ???

    you attempt to kill me… you better complete your job

  12. life is about choices and decisions! Simple as that! The 17 yr old made a decision choice and the driver made a much stronger choice and Karma won!

  13. To funny! I bet that kid is out robbing people again. The only lesson here is that guns jam but cars don't. It's better to hit him when he's in the street so you don't damage your car as bad, then you can back up on his head to put him out of his misery like the animal he is.

  14. Why should a person in the process of committing a theft not be run over, if it is necessary to stop him?

    I believe Criminal should lose all rights in the process of Committing a Crime, and be financially & legally liable for ALL the damages incurred by his choice to commit it.

    And give longer minimum sentences for physical harm done by those choosing to commit the crime (& not those defending or preventing it).

    That is all fair, including if I was the stealing or mugging others.

  15. Comparing this circumstance to your apartment getting robbed while vacant is null. The robbers gun jammed which means he tried to fire it, I say running him over was justified. If the robber hadn't of tried to murder the driver it'd be a different story.

  16. There has to be common sense – The guy gets 3 weeks International Tour as a hero and a medal. The kid gets 30 years for armed robbery. Whatever happened to common sense in judgments?

  17. I’m pissed that punk didn’t die! I would have backed up and run over him again! That idiot will think twice before he pulls that stunt again! Beware of the one armed bandit!!

  18. I believe he used excessive force when running over the kid. He could have done so much slower and then disarm the kid on the floor

  19. Here is why the driver was charged, because once the boy was out of the car, he was no longer an immediate threat. So legally, the driver was wrong. Now do I agree with what he did, hmm 50/50, I certainly would want revenge, but trying to run him over might have been a bit extreme.

  20. The host saying you “can’t run someone over thats robbed u” is completely false. The driver had every right to run him over and end the threat. The teen deserved to die and I bet he won’t rob anyone ever again

  21. Well. Do we believe the witnesses who said the gun jammed? Was that just a made up story to excuse ramming the kid with the car?
    To me it is unlikely the robber tried to shoot.
    The police have to test the gun.
    Even if he tried the threat is over and the hit is not justified as self defense.

  22. "an unlawful weapon and also for ya know pulling a gun on this guy" You mean trying to shoot someone during an armed robbery? Its OK be on the side of the actual victim you idiots, the only thing that could make this better is if he died from blood loss in a ditch and was never found. This channel is a joke.

  23. Should’ve took off Both Arms so he couldn’t try and Kill someone over f#%king shoes..btw 🖕🏾The Young Turds

  24. Misfires!! Game On!! The next person he would have robbed, might have not been as lucky. Surely he won’t hold up anyone else. Warning ⚠️ You never know who you are dealing with❄️.

  25. The TYT are so out of touch, you people are such a joke. Young man with a gun should be charged with attempted murder. And the man with the vehicle should be given A metal. And it’s too bad they didn’t attach his arm backwards, that would’ve been great.

  26. I guarantee it that if the victim was white and did that these two would be having a field day with the accusations of racism and that the victim should be charged with attempted murder, if the victim is charged with attempted murder why is the pos thief not charged with that also as he must have tried to fire the gun if it jammed.

  27. so now the taxpayers will foot the hospital bills and probably this pos will receive welfare/disability for life.

  28. The thing is he put the gun to the drivers head the driver hit him… it’s not attempted murder it’s self defense it’s probably cause he is probably black

  29. That 17 year old walked off with a gun after robbing someone. Taking in the facted that the gun jammed means he fired it to kill. Running him over is protecting the public. Case closed guys a hero

  30. Of course they take the side of the thief. These are the deniers of the genocide in Turkey, so of course they are in the seed of evil.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *